<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: URGENT ACTION ALERT- California AB 372</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.babylovechild.org/2009/05/12/urgent-action-alert-california-ab-372/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.babylovechild.org/2009/05/12/urgent-action-alert-california-ab-372/</link>
	<description>Yet another Bastard Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 21:20:28 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Baby Love Child</title>
		<link>http://www.babylovechild.org/2009/05/12/urgent-action-alert-california-ab-372/comment-page-1/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>Baby Love Child</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 09:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babylovechild.org/?p=531#comment-616</guid>
		<description>Actually, the &quot;8 million start up&quot; is crazier still.

See the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.calopen.org/asmapanab37220090512.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Assembly Appropriations Committee Analysis&lt;/a&gt; which lays out-

&lt;blockquote&gt;
 creating the required database, the cost of notifying birth parents, and processing requests for original birth certificates will likely be in excess of $8 million costs for each of the first two years of the program. By the third year, costs will be in the range of $2 million per year.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

and 

&lt;blockquote&gt;
approximately $4 million of the funding in each of the first two years would be related to necessary automation changes and the creation of the database &lt;/blockquote&gt;

not only is this completely nuts, but they claim this model was built on

&lt;blockquote&gt;experience with a similar law in Oregon&lt;/blockquote&gt;

A state whose primary financial costs had to do with defending the new law in court against those who were trying to get it struck down (Oregon being a national precedent and all.)

Basing any notion of CA&#039;s projected costs on Oregon&#039;s experiences just shows how deeply the lack of historical understanding pervades those working on AB 372.





</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the &#8220;8 million start up&#8221; is crazier still.</p>
<p>See the <a href="http://www.calopen.org/asmapanab37220090512.pdf" rel="nofollow">Assembly Appropriations Committee Analysis</a> which lays out-</p>
<blockquote><p>
 creating the required database, the cost of notifying birth parents, and processing requests for original birth certificates will likely be in excess of $8 million costs for each of the first two years of the program. By the third year, costs will be in the range of $2 million per year.</p></blockquote>
<p>and </p>
<blockquote><p>
approximately $4 million of the funding in each of the first two years would be related to necessary automation changes and the creation of the database </p></blockquote>
<p>not only is this completely nuts, but they claim this model was built on</p>
<blockquote><p>experience with a similar law in Oregon</p></blockquote>
<p>A state whose primary financial costs had to do with defending the new law in court against those who were trying to get it struck down (Oregon being a national precedent and all.)</p>
<p>Basing any notion of CA&#8217;s projected costs on Oregon&#8217;s experiences just shows how deeply the lack of historical understanding pervades those working on AB 372.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

